法律教育网

法律英语

2019瑞达法考客观题学习包

考试内容 报名条件 报名时间 报名方法

成绩查询 考试时间 分 数 线 授予资格

您的位置:法律教育网 > 法律英语 > 经典案例 > 正文

宝洁公司错误广告取得销售

2016-03-02 16:25 纠错

Cincinnati-based P&G made the false claims but not willfully.

The verdict capped a two-week trial in which Playtex accused the consumer products giant of falsely claiming that its product, Tampax Pearl, provided superior comfort, protection and absorbency over the Playtex Gentle Glide tampon.

Playtex lawyer Jeffrey A. Schwab asked Judge William H. Pauley for a court order blocking P&G from continuing to make the claims in its advertising. The judge said he would consider the request next week.

“I would suggest there's some urgency in this matter,” Schwab said.

P&G spokeswoman Elaine Plummer said the company was studying its appeal options.

“The most meaningful verdict is the one women make after they have tried Tampax Pearl, realize it is superior to the leading plastic, and then purchase more. That decision is handed down every day by thousands of women at the store shelf,” she said.

In a statement, Playtex Chief Executive Officer Michael Gallagher said the case had always been “about truth and fairness” for the Westport, Conn. company.

“It is regrettable that Procter & Gamble had to resort to false advertising. Now that the jury has spoken, we expect that P&G will compete fairly and truthfully in the marketplace. We look forward to that challenge and are confident we will succeed,” he said.

Schwab had told jurors that P&G made the false claims because it knew that tampon customers rarely change products unless they are told that a competitor's brand provides superior protection.

P&G's attorney, Harry P. Weinberger, had argued that the company's product was superior and that the advertising claims were not false. He accused Playtex of trying to win in the court what it was failing to win in the marketplace.

Playtex had portrayed its quest as a David and Goliath-type fight against P&G, which is 50 times larger than Playtex.

Playtex has annual sales of $800 million and says it controls about 30 percent of the tampon market. It says P&G, with annual sales topping $60 billion, has about 40 percent of the tampon market.

In a counterclaim, P&G had argued that Playtex was falsely advertising that some of its tampons were “so comfortable that you can't even feel them.” The jury rejected that claim.

In court papers, P&G said Tambrands introduced Tampax tampons, the first tampons, in 1936.

P&G bought Tambrands in 1997 and spent more than $110 million researching and developing a plastic applicator tampon to compete with Playtex. Playtex had dominated the plastic tampon market since it first introduced its product in 1968.

In closing arguments Thursday, Playtex lawyer Matthew B. Lehr has asked the jury for as much as $14.55 million in damages.

After the verdict, he called it a “great day for Playtex.”

“It wasn't about the money,” he said.

In trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Procter & Gamble shares rose 22 cents to close at $89.80 while Playtex shares gained 2 cents to $7.67.

责任编辑:仪

特别推荐

地图
法律教育网官方微信

法律教育网微信公众号向您推荐考试资讯、辅导资料、考试教材、历年真题、法律常识、法律法规等资讯,只有你想不到,没有我们做不到!详情>>

1、凡本网注明“来源:法律教育网”的所有作品,版权均属法律教育网所有,未经本网授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用;已经本网授权的,应在授权范围内使用,且必须注明“来源:法律教育网”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其法律责任。

2、本网部分资料为网上搜集转载,均尽力标明作者和出处。对于本网刊载作品涉及版权等问题的,请作者与本网站联系,本网站核实确认后会尽快予以处理。

本网转载之作品,并不意味着认同该作品的观点或真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人转载使用,请与著作权人联系,并自负法律责任。

3、本网站欢迎积极投稿